The Future is Now

With the emergence of Gen Y as legitimate shoppers, online shopping is expected to rise rapidly, what does this mean to traditional retailers?

Online Vs. Traditional: Information Search

Do consumers behave differently in an online environment? Retail literature says "Hmmm, maybe..."

Online Vs. Traditional: Consumer Motivation

Why do people shop? Why do they do it online? Why don't they do it online? Consumer motivation is surely one cherry retailers would love to pick

Showrooming: The Start of the Dark Ages?

When consumers start using brick and mortar stores as showrooms for online stores, how can they be stopped?

What They Say: Travis Hearn, Sales Assistant

Get insider insight on what people on the industry think about online shopping and traditional retail

Showing posts with label CMI. Show all posts
Showing posts with label CMI. Show all posts

Sunday, 1 April 2012

Showrooming: The Start of the Dark Ages?


Recently, a new dreaded word has entered the traditional retailer’s vocabulary, and that word is “Showrooming”.  It is a word used to describe a phenomenon where shoppers come into a brick and mortar store to see a product in person, and even try it out, but make the purchase online, often for a lower price. Again, this is just another instance of where traditional retailers feel that their investments are being used by their online rivals, and large retailers such as Target and Walmart has urged their suppliers to create special products that is only available to their respective stores.

yup, something special, like guns

In the United States, online only accounts for about 8 percent of total retail purchase by customers, but it is growing very quickly. While everyone is trying hard to gain traction with their online arm of business, large retailers such as the aforementioned Target and Walmart only get about 1-2% of their business online, quite far from the national standard, and highlights their awkwardness with the medium

 about the right level of awkward
While there are many players in online commerce, one giant stands out from the rest. Amazon.com is quite possibly the strongest online retailer at the moment, and they try different tactics to aggressively chip away the advantages that traditional brick and mortar retailers have.
In fact, Amazon has developed an application that allows users to take a picture of a product at a brick and mortar store, and find out how much Amazon is selling it for. To add insult to injury, Amazon also had a promotion that gives an extra 5 percent discount to users who would use the application at a brick and mortar store, but make the purchase online with Amazon. 

Looking at what marketing and online commerce literature tells us, especially in the consumer behavior discourse, it is quite understandable why something like this would happen. One of the main barriers to online shopping is the presence of risk for consumers. With the Internet being a relatively new channel of commerce, there are a few impending unknowns that a regular shopper has to face. 
Going back to traditional shopping behavior, Jacoby and Kaplan (1972) have identified five components of risk, which are economic, performance, physical, psychological and social. Going to the online environment, research has shown that while most shoppers acknowledge the benefits of online purchases (Mariani and Zappala 2006), most cannot get over the financial risk relating to the use of credit cards on the Internet (Bhatnagar, Misra and Rao 2000).

 because some risks are just not worth it
In the current environment, there has been ways to alleviate the financial risk of an online purchase, whether it is the actual security improvement of most sites, or the availability of third party entities that act as a buffer between a buyer and a seller, such as Paypal. One factor that links directly to product is the risk of the product not performing to expectations or product performance risk (Dall’Olmo Riley, Scarpi and Manaresi 2006).
This risk is exaggerated in an online environment, mostly due to the inability to physically touch or try the product (Forsythe and Shi 2003). This limitation means that consumers have to rely on other signals to be persuaded to shop, such as the reputation of the brand, review from other users or prior experience with similar products in an offline setting.
Showrooming as a phenomenon is actually a peek towards the future, where people try to overcome one limitation of a platform by utilizing another platform. The question is how retailers can combat this, and even if consumers want to make purchases online, they do it at the traditional retailers store. There are no easy answers for this conundrum, but traditional retailers have to realize that it is not something that can be stopped half-heartedly.

half hearted is going to a Helloween party like this
Getting products that are unique to your store is a start, but more needs to be done, from actually trying to change the business model, creating a new way of doing retail, or providing an experience for shoppers that cannot be replicated online. Traditional retailers might not have the answers now, but in the end, only those who can eventually answer this question will survive. 

Reference:

Bhatnagar, A., S., Misra, and Rao, H.R. 2000. On Risk, Convenience, and Internet Shopping Behavior. Communications of the ACM 43(11): 98-105. Emerald. http://emerald.com (accessed March 10, 2012).

Forsythe, S.M. and Shi, B. 2003. Consumer patronage and risk perceptions in Internet shopping. Journal of Business Research 56: 867-875. Informit. http://informit.com (accessed March 5, 2012).
Jacoby, J. and Kaplan, L.B. (1972). The Components of Perceived Risk. Proceedings of the Third Annual Conference of the Association for Consumer Research 3: 383-393.

Mariani, M. and S. Zappala. 2006. Risk Perception in Online Shopping. In Impact of e-Commerce on Conumers and Small Firms, ed. Zappala, S. and C. Gray, 179-89. Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing Limited.

Scarpi, D. 2006. The Fun Side of the Internet. In Impact of e-Commerce on Conumers and Small Firms, ed. Zappala, S. and C. Gray, 179-89. Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing Limited.

Friday, 30 March 2012

Online Vs. Traditional: Consumer Motivation


A very important aspect that retailers are always interested to know more about is the reason why people shop. Why someone would choose a red coffee machine over a silver one, or why someone would only purchase milk at a particular store. Obviously there is no single answer that will satisfy each question, but marketing literature has always been quite fascinated with consumer motivation.
Motivation can be defined as “an internal and complex process, which influences people’s behavior and is caused by particular motives” (Keisidou, Sarigiannidis, and Maditinos 2011, 33). One popular concept is the identification of two main motives for shoppers, which are hedonic and utilitarian. In short, hedonic shoppers are consumers who shop for fun, and utilitarian shoppers are consumers who shop with a goal in mind (Babin et al. 1994).
some behavior are beyond comprehension
This mindset translates well into the online environment, where hedonic online shoppers are motivated to find involvement with things that they consider fun. Typically, a hedonic online shopper would frequent online auction sites, hobby specific sites, and browse to their hearts content to seek a product specific online experience. On the other hand, the utilitarian shopper is depicted by motives such as convenience, information, selection, and the ability to control the shopping experience (Sorce, Perotti, and Widrick 2005).
While some researches suggest that the introduction of the hedonic and utilitarian concept in an online setting is quite seamless, other research suggest that there are significant differences. Scarpi (2006) argue that hedonic shoppers, who find pleasure in the shopping act itself rather than the acquired product, would not be motivated to shop online, because it would forgo the pleasure they get from shopping in a physical store. 
 sophie kinsella: making millions out of the hedonic shopper
 While there are other researches that use different frameworks, they are mostly reiterations of the hedonic and utilitarian classification. For example, Kargaonkar and Wolin (1999) identified seven different motives that may affect the consumers’ behavior in an online environment. These motives are: social escapism, transaction security and privacy, information, interactive control, socialization, non-transactional privacy, and economic motivation.
There are lessons to be learned here for both the traditional retailers as well online retailers. First, both type of stores have to cater for both type of consumers, which means that while shopping has to be a great experience, it should also provide an opportunity for utilitarian shoppers to just get in, get what they need, and get out.
Secondly, when it comes to engaging the consumers, so that their hedonistic needs are fulfilled, stores have to constantly innovate. Some retailers do not change their store displays for years, and they wonder why less people are interested in coming into the store and spend time shopping. 
 have you seen our new display? It's only been there since 1987
Understanding the consumer’s motivation is one thing, adjusting your strategy to capture the consumer is another thing. A lot of traditional retailers fail in their attempt to branch out to online retail because all they do is sell the same products online. What they do not realize is that consumers come to their brick and mortar stores not just because of the products they sell, but also because of the shopping experience that they provide. Until they manage to translate the shopping experience into an online environment, consumers will most likely shun the online versions of their stores.
References:
Babin, B., Darden, W. and Griffin, M. 1994. Work and/or fun: measuring hedonic and utilitarian shopping value. Journal of Consumer Research. 20: 644-56. Proquest. http://proquest.com (accessed March 13, 2012).
Keisidou, E., L. Sarigiannidis, and Maditinos, D. 2011. Consumer Characteristics and Their Effect on Accepting Online Shopping, in the Context of Different Product Types. International Journal of Business Science and Applied Management 6(2): 32-51. Emerald. http://emerald.com (accessed March 10, 2012).
Korgaonkar, P. and Wolin, L. (1999), A multivariate analysis of web usage. Journal of Advertising Research. 38 (1): 7-21. Proquest. http://proquest.com (accessed March 13, 2012).
Scarpi, D. 2006. The Fun Side of the Internet. In Impact of e-Commerce on Conumers and Small Firms, ed. Zappala, S. and C. Gray, 179-89. Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing Limited.
Sorce, P., V. Perotti, and Widrick, S. 2005. Attitude and Age Differences in Online Buying. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management 33(2):122-132. Emerald. http://emerald.com (accessed March 10, 2012).


Tuesday, 27 March 2012

The Future is Now: The Arrival of Gen Y

Traditionally, Christmas is a very good time for everyone involved. From consumers who are eager to shop for gifts for loved ones, to the retailers providing shoppers with goods and services. 2011 broke this mold, with Australian retailers reporting a drop in December sales figures in comparison to November. Retailers hoped for a 0.5 percent increase, and the 0.1 percent decrease came as a significant blow. This unexpected dip made 2011 the worst performing year for retail since 1984 (2011 Retail Sales Worst in 27 Years as Christmas Disappoints 2012). 

another reason Christmas is disappointing

On the other hand, another figure showed an opposite trend. It is expected that Australian online retail industry to grow by 40 percent by 2012, in comparison to 2010 numbers (Bullock, 2010). While latest figures show that online sales only amount to about 5 percent of total retail sales, it’s predicted that it will only be rising. This has prompted local traditional retailers such as David Jones, Myer, Harvey Norman, and Target to call for GST to be added to overseas online transactions (Greenwood, 2011).

E-commerce or E-retail is not a new phenomena, it has been around almost as long as the Internet. While the dot.com crash of 2000 dampens expectations somewhat, online commerce chugs along consistently, posting tremendous growth year after year (Dennis, Fenech and Merrilees 2004). Recent study from the United States predict that compared to 2011 numbers, there will be a rise of 62 percent by 2016, which will amount to 327 billion USD (Rueter 2012). While Australia is not as advanced as the United States when it comes to online commerce, its high Internet penetration rate means that it will not be far behind. 

With the emergence of generation Y as legitimate shoppers, prior literature regarding online shopping behavior needs to be revisited and examined. Generation Y are practically born with the Internet available to them, especially in developed countries. Online shopping literature has indicated that extended experience with the Internet will increase the likelihood of online shopping. With this in mind, while retailers have plenty to whinge about now, online retail still only amounts to about 5 percent of total retail spend. This number is predicted to rise rapidly, and traditional retailers can only survive by finding new and innovative ways to reinvent the whole retail experience. The arrival of Generation Y and their constant link with the latest information will surely push traditional retailers to rethink their strategy.

not all of them are that well informed.

The funk that traditional brick and mortar stores are currently experiencing is an issue that needs to be addressed by everyone involved, and marketers are key in trying to find a solution. Innovation is often hailed by many as the savior that will lead retailers out of this rut, but not many realizes that innovation takes many shapes and forms, and someone needs to create innovation that consumers would like to connect with. This blog will try to highlight various aspects that differentiates the experience of shopping online and shopping in a brick and mortar store, and try to find the reasoning of why consumers do what they do. We will also try to shed some light on some of the innovative practices that some retailers are trying to do in order to combat consumers declining interest of the physical store. Finally, we will also try to share the reasoning of why it is important to save traditional retailers, and why it does have an impact to all of us.

Reference:

2011 retail sales worst in 27 years as Christmas disappoints. 2001. http://www.marketingmag.com.au/news/2011-retail-sales-worst-in-27-years-as-christmas-disappoints-10373/ (accessed March 3, 2012)

Bullock, M. 2010. Australia’s Ecommerce Industry is Expected to Experience Significant Growth in the Coming Year. http://www.eway.com.au/ecommerce-news/post/2010/07/08/Australias-ecommerce-industry-is-expected-to-experience-significant-growth-in-the-coming-year087.aspx (accessed March 7th, 2012)
Greenwood, H. 2011. Switched-on Consumers Signal Sea Change in Retail. http://www.smh.com.au/business/switchedon-consumers-signal-sea-change-in-retail-20110107-19iq7.html (accessed March 8th, 2012)
Dennis, C.E., T. Fenech, and Merrilees, B. 2004. E-Retailing. Chicago: Routledge  
Rueter, T. 2012. E-retail Spending to Increase by 62% by 2016. http://www.internetretailer.com/2012/02/27/e-retail-spending-increase-45-2016 (accessed March 8th, 2012).